Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya has questioned the reported withdrawal of his security for the second time, demanding an explanation from the National Police Service.
In a statement on Thursday, October 15, Natembeya argued that any decision affecting his security must comply with the Constitution and the rule of law.
He cited Article 47 of the Constitution, which guarantees every person the right to lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative action.
Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya. Photo: Courtesy.
He maintained that authorities must provide written reasons for decisions that adversely affect an individual’s rights or fundamental freedoms.
The governor also referenced Article 238, which requires national security operations to respect the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as Article 244, which outlines the National Police Service’s obligations on professionalism, discipline and respect for human dignity.
Natembeya called on Inspector-General of Police Douglas Kanja to explain the circumstances surrounding the reported withdrawal and confirm whether the relevant procedures had been followed.
He further cited a High Court ruling reported on June 3, 2025, concerning the withdrawal of security assigned to five governors.
He argued that the ruling provided guidance on the legal requirements authorities must observe when making decisions affecting the security of public officials.
The governor clarified that he was not opposed to lawful security reviews but insisted that any changes to his security arrangements must follow objective criteria and remain free from discrimination or political interference.
Natembeya maintained that the matter would not distract him from his duties as Trans Nzoia governor, reaffirming his commitment to serving residents and upholding constitutional principles.
He urged the relevant authorities to clarify the repeated withdrawal and ensure that appropriate security arrangements remained in place in accordance with the law.
